Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes. Do you agree or disagree
There is a constant debate about what creates admirable athletes or musicians. Although some people have an inborn tendency, I would argue that success also relies on learning and hardworking of any child.
On the one hand, plenty of good sports person or musicians are born with talents. Firstly, those who have innate ability such as body smart or music smart tend to perform as if they had been practiced for a long period. For example, one of my friends can easily learn to play piano in a short time, she was able to play Fur Elise in three days while others ordinarily would have to spend two weeks. Secondly, children who own congenital talents are presumably passionate about what they specialize in. Therefore, those children apparently have the motivation to practice to reach the target.
On the other hand, it is probably true to say that a child can be taught to be good at sport or music. Essentially, becoming a reputable athlete or musician require not only talents but also other elements such as dedication. For instance, children need to go through tough training with their coach to become first-rate athletes to participate in the national team. Additionally, I believe that suitable educational method is one of the most critical aspects for children to receive a commendation in sport or music. An admirable teacher can stimulate children’s spirit in the field they choose, especially in music.
In conclusion, while some people are born with physical or musical qualification, I believe that children can be trained to be a good athlete or musician.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ild. On the one hand, plenty of good sports person or musicians are born with talen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80405386717 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4805120667 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0654328514899 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247666768219 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215028786159 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478562713633 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019886470998 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.