The charts below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010, with projected sales for 2020.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010, with projected sales for 2020.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.

The charts indicate the total magazines sold per person in five countries, namely in 2000, 2010 and anticipated turnover for 2020.
It’s clear from the graph that magazines in three countries include Country A, Country B and Country C were the best-sellers in 2000 among three years 2000,2010 and 2020. By contrast, other countries, Country D and Country E combined, had the lowest figure for those buying elements in 2000 far and wide.
On the one hand, Country A, B and C are having a tendency to decrease the demand for magazines per person throughout 2000, 2010 and 2020. Country B has the first-rate sales in all three years, especially it reached the highest point of 50 magazines in 2000 and are expected to experience a minimal deterioration by 45 magazines in 2020. Apart from Country B, Country A and C have been declining the factor for magazines from 49 magazines and 37 magazines in 2000 to 38 and 31 in 2020 respectively by far.
On the other hand, Country D and E always have the least magazines sold in this period, particularly, Country E has the slightest sales among the five countries. Noticeably, the number of buying magazines have been recovering slowly from 19 magazines in 2000 to 21 in 2020. Along Country D, Country E sold only 7 magazines per person in 2000 and went up by 9 magazines in 2010. In spite of this slight growth, the figure for buying magazines are similar to its number at the beginning of the period.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, apart from, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70196078431 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72413282605 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474509803922 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9108975993 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355079711488 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184807144157 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749598696231 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265632018445 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494548958254 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.