Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It’s easy to be seen that many environmental issues due to the enhancement of the economy and society. Apart from a list of discussions about solutions, I would argue that not only governments and groups can make a change but also individuals can contribute to improving our environment.
To begin with, governments and big companies play a significant role in advancing the environment. First of all, plenty of campaigns, plans or newly strict rules combined can be created by authorities and groups such as Protecting Environment campaigns including planting trees, collecting trashes on the beach or obey residence not to throw trash on public area or community, … Especially individuals are allowed to pay the huge fine in case they break the law. Secondly, tremendous people will be influenced by politics or companies throughout means of media; for instance, televisions, social network, radio, … By virtue of that, the monumental community can participate in those campaigns and plans or can be inspired and get more awareness of defending and conserving the environment.
Along these lines, individuals devote a big part of progressing environment. Essentially, an individual cannot come up with a big reforming, but the whole community can make it possible. For example, each person just only has to reduce using the amount of plastic bags or bottles or put the trash at the right place, therefore, hundreds of people can save the planet by doing little things. Individuals not only change their habits completely by living healthily and environmentally - friendly, but also they can disseminate and spread their lifestyle to other people all over the world; hence, more and more people know how important to makeover their manners conserving the environment.
In conclusion, protecting the environment and the Earth is everyone’s responsibility. Both governments, big companies, and individuals have to do it together.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40460526316 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20160199083 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.484977151 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.363636364 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4545454545 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293158609322 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10407161527 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686820770696 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169029251667 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584165194837 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.