Some people say it is a waste of time to plan for the future and that it is more important to focus on the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that having plans for the future is not as important as concentrating on the present since this activity is too time-consuming. Personally, I do not totally follow this idea because of the rationales following.
First of all, to achieve the objectives that were set, a person needs to have a specific strategy. For example, in making any plans, he should think about how to pursue his aims, what he needs and who can support him. Therefore, making the best preparation that helps to have a solid foundation to follow and reach his dream is a must. If he wants to take a dream job, to illustrate, he should find out what skills or certificates needed in the field that will contribute in the future to be qualified for it.
Moreover, designing a plan is an efficient method for reducing the risks that may occur. For instance, on the path to success, people will definitely face with many difficulties that distract them. Hence, plans will help people handle flexibly in any situation so that the problems are able to be solved easier. Additionally, the risk of failure will be avoided. Take companies as the clearest evidence, prior to any campaigns, each association always conduct risk research to reduce the cost loss, thus it can receive a higher revenue which contributes massively to the achievement of it.
To sum up, I believe planning is an effective way to assist everyone in setting a right track to success and refraining from causing problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87351778656 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79443006389 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9494659303 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177090953628 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607332229572 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081460648424 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108477524225 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089614197713 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.