Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Environment is the topic of debates of many decades in every parts of the world. While a strong possibility is that species extinction proved as seriously enormous puzzle, many hold their belief that numerous contributions involve in exacerbating the environment. This essay will elaborate both sides and state my view.
There are several key causes leading to species loss is the major problem. Firstly, a mass ecological catastrophe can stem from natural creature evaporation. The biodiversity has disastrously experienced ever reduction, including both flora and fauna species, since they are standing poised on the brink of extinction. Secondly, their disappearance is also an indicator of destructively worse threats being posed to our environment. Many of them has medical benefits for us, taking mugwort as an example, it is known as an effective treatment to malaria. Or ocean algae provides up to 60% oxygen in the world.
However, others have a firm conviction that many factors do distribute to natural worsening. The fact is the underlying reason of almost environmental catastrophes is stemmed from humankind properly helps backup this opinion. I personally subscribe to the idea that human-induced climate change has brought humanity and other kinds to a position of our own making to where we are posing dangers to our existence. For example, industrialization or urbanization has produced tons of carbon emission to the atmosphere causing global warm. Consequently, if the earth constantly experience highly heat temperature, this planet will be led to be uninhabitable.
Inconclusion, the eternal disappearance of natural species is the huge reppercursion of environmental problem. But human causes act as an astronomic contribution of this global severe situation, where we should not exclude thinking thoroughly about its possibilities and implement appropriate policies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...on proved as seriously enormous puzzle, many hold their belief that numerous contribution...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62937062937 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31691966829 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678321678322 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9563732175 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150604345966 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04559947316 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531556330336 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858616294849 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00467270930839 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.