Since the industrial revolution, human activities has caused over a million species and plants to become extinct. While some people are agreed that the most important issue is rapidly decreasing number of rare type of plants and creatures, others are prefer to other problems are more necessary that saving them. I think that people should give their attention to the maintaining species that going to instinct is more significant matter than others.
The former point of view is more important environmental issues that people are facing than extincting plants and animals such as climate change and pollution. Because folks do not notice about vanishing species and herbs. For example, information sources such as TV and social media often mention about global warming and pollution of air, soil and water. Due to this lack of info, humans did not consider about instinction of particular kinds of plants and animals.
The latter view that i agreed is saving alive being except humankind is more essential than other environmental issues. So that all the living species are the main source of environment. If people prefer to maintain those type of existence, they could solve the other problems. Wet worms, for instance, can recover the soil to be more nutritious to grow plants and vegetables. For these reasons, people should rather to put preserving animals and plants before different kind of issues.
In conclusion, human being is stem of the all environmental problems that people are suffering. According to these matter some people think that loss of plants and creatures is the most important problem of environment, but others are skeptical about it. In my opinion, people should solve the problem that reducing alive being first and it can help that other environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...ype of plants and creatures, others are prefer to other problems are more necessary th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s and animals. The latter view that i agreed is saving alive being except hum...
^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ential than other environmental issues. So that all the living species are the main sou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21034482759 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62134519932 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7092046709 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355099910981 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11670024887 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070095987488 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217403477922 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576993302858 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.