Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
One school of thought holds that advances in technology facilitate the way people shop. While I accept that this perception is somewhat justifiable, I would stand on the opposite view that modern technology may bring confusion and annoyance to shoppers.
On the one hand, by the use of cutting-edge technology in the fields of shopping, customers can have a great experience both online and in-store shops. Firstly, the advent of modern robotics can increase the consumption of global products without being concerned about geography constraints. For example, thanks to the advances of technology that a Nike fan Vietnamese can order in advance the latest Fly 4 products running shoes as soon as they are published on e-commerce online markets such as Amazon to satisfy their demand of shopping. Secondly, in terms of in-store shopping, the flexibility of setting payment methods facilitates the way customers purchase each product. In particular, unlike old methods of paying, customers in the modern-day can easily pay the bills with only a QR check or credit card.
On the other hand, there are a myriad of compelling reasons as I am convinced that it is uncomfortable for customers to shop when having the appearance of robotics. To demonstrate, it can cause a sense of confusion for people to decide what they should buy when there is a wide range of recommendation choices on digital advertisements. Moreover, modern technology could still contain flaws or bugs that annoy shoppers. For instance, the most commonly used app Mono failed to give its customers the receipt after the transaction for a long period, which made users hardly deal with their payment and others electricity or water bills.
In conclusion, although modern technology can bring for us a large number of potential benefits to purchase things, I believe the annoying feeling when installed technology is installed can break the expectations of today’s customers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...card. On the other hand, there are a myriad of compelling reasons as I am convinced...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ough modern technology can bring for us a large number of potential benefits to purchase things, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25961538462 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96053755703 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8170960169 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171660938228 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061628412108 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397975861839 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111515348919 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472018054943 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.