Some people say that products should be designed to last as long as possible. Others say that it is more important for products to be as cheap as possible.
In our modern world people try to make their lives better and more comfortable. Based on this situation, humans are mismatched in their opinions about the cost and the quality of products they use- while some of them state that items have to be affordable as much as possible, others argue that creations' suitability should last for a long time. In this essay writer will discuss and analyze both views and claim own point of view.
On the one hand, followers of the first statement are right to some extent too. To illustrate that, when tools are way too expensive, people themselves and industrial or other companies cannot allow themselves to buy it, when there are hold lots of buildings and installations everywhere. The second reason may be the deficite of these products because of their price and rarety. There is not any warranty for expensive items to serve a considerable period of time as well. The expensive price does not always mean the long productivity of an item.
Similarly, the claimers of the second view are also mostly right. The cheapness of the products does not even matter if it has not suitable quality and ability of long service. Here is the most clear and understandable explanation of the given situation: rather than buying defective goods repeatedly during an accurate couples of time, buying the wares of high cost once would be the best desicion. If the product is of a high or good quality, people are not ought to exchange them or to buy the new ones, which can significantly reduce money expenses. This can somehow make people feel good in psychological level, when they see their item's long period of service.
Writing about my own opinion, from my point of view it is possible to please both sides' requirements. In present days different researches are performed by scients, therefore they can easily create materials from any stuff, that is familiar to us, to produce both affordable and quantitative products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'creations'' or 'creation's'?
Suggestion: creations'; creation's
... as much as possible, others argue that creations suitability should last for a long time...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...expensive items to serve a considerable period of time as well. The expensive price does not a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'couple'?
Suggestion: couple
...ive goods repeatedly during an accurate couples of time, buying the wares of high cost ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, similarly, so, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90963855422 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66203040261 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7359970628 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226869176925 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652810828546 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583692155691 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121091666296 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565925662913 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.