Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?

Essay topics:

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?

Although wildlife need to be protecting but some people agrue that goverment and society paying too much attention and resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. I strong agree with this opinion and I will explain in this essay.
First of all, it is not too much seriously if several species disappear. In fact, there was amount of wildlife and birds extinct in our century but it is not dangerous effects more than the greenhouse effect and natural disaster. Besides, some species was extinct because the removing of natural and the other species so we should not devote too much attention to the protection of wildlife.
Secondly, government should spend public money for important problems instead waste money for research and protection wild animals and birds. Every year, there are a big amount of money are spent for DNA species and historical research. This money can improve the quality of life such as build hospital, research for HIV and cancer, free study cost and training jobs.
Finally, government can apply simple solutions for protection wild animals which are not give too much resources. For example, government can impose some heavy punishment for poacher who damage animals and promote protection of animals through internet. By this way, government can save a large amount of money.
In conclusion, wild animals and birds need to be protected by right way and save money.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
... and birds. Every year, there are a big amount of money are spent for DNA species and ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ion wild animals which are not give too much resources. For example, government can ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49168754668 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4872518106 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314788560817 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119211486295 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110150950026 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190203438524 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143524382332 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.