Some people say that travelling abroad is necessary to get knowledge about other countries, while others suggest that TV and the internet can also help people know about foreign countries. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The debate about whether should people to visit abroad to learn about other culture has been long controversy. And until now, there is still no final conclusion on it. This essay will discuss both views.
On the one hand, some people believe learning form the Internet or TV saves time as well as money. The development of technology like smart phone and internet enables residents to acquire almost all kinds of knowledge they needed without going outside. The advances in imaging technology make videos more real and accurate, also provide more detail. So it is a better way for people who has less time or money to travel oversea to learn about other countries. Moreover, some scenic spots where with too many tourists can makes the travel experience poor and sick. Therefore, travelling abroad is unnecessary in this case.
However, there are many advocators who declare that only by physical travel can tourists know a country in a deep and real way. Tourists not only can visiting local tourist attractions like ancient palace or modern museum, but also can they communicate with local people. With an enjoyable chat in personal lifestyle or on traditional culture, visitors can have a deeper impression of that place.
From my perspective, the two ways of learning about the world have their own benefit. For people who has sufficient time and money, travelling physically obviously bring more enjoyable experience. But for people whose money and time do not allow, learning the outside world from internet or TV is also useful in some case.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
... one hand, some people believe learning form the Internet or TV saves time as well a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to form'
Suggestion: to form
... one hand, some people believe learning form the Internet or TV saves time as well a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing abroad is unnecessary in this case. However, there are many advocators who d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06201550388 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50269970211 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6953554256 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280539386179 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852174121786 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676137884114 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161932082085 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605704812776 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.