Some people say that TV advertisements are helpful for viewers, while others disagree. Discuss both viewpoints and give your opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether TV commercials are useful for viewers or not. I believe it helps people from various points of view.
The idea that TV adverts are not beneficial for the viewers is advocated by the people on the basis of unnecessary spending and consumption of junk food. With regard to the former, television commercials show a variety of products which in turn creates artificial wants in the users' minds. Such wants encourage television watchers to spend their money on useless products. The ultimate aim of advertising is to subtly persuade people to buy things. It is also thought that TV adverts promote junk food which is not healthy for human beings. Children are easily influenced by commercials and then pester their parents to buy certain products. Consuming junk foods like pizza, burgers, and food prepared with white flour are harmful from a health point of view. Obesity is one of the major concerns of eating junk food.
However, the above arguments can be rejected because adverts create general awareness. As far as unnecessary spending is concerned, adverts help people save money by informing them about real bargains. Catalogs and brochures enable people to compare products and services at leisure. If the user does not have time to shop around, he relies on advertising to learn about the new products. As for the idea of junk food, without advertising, people would not be able to make informed choices. After watching TV commercials they now have the idea of what is healthy food and what is junk food. Which in turn changes their whole perception towards junk food.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea that TV commercials are useful for the viewers on the basis of spreading awareness about junk food and provides the capability to bargain with other competitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is healthy food and what is junk food. Which in turn changes their whole perception ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, as for, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01655629139 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61480612804 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543046357616 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6262674145 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15495972969 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548640658405 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057801451703 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128453617592 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564976257643 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.