Some people think that the best way to improve road transport safety is to let the driver test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divide on whether the driving test could play a crucial role in improving road vehicle safety. I believe that the security on highways could be improved by improving road infrastructure and time to time medical check-ups.
It is a widely held belief that the effective way to enhance road transport safety is by undergoing driving tests every year, in practice, this is not a cost-effective solution. Evidence for this can be seen in the fact that conducting such tests would put a strain on the government to provide more driving test facilities and more staff. In fact, it would put a financial burden on people who are undertaking these tests. This is because the government would have to spend tax payer's money unnecessarily on arranging test centers to access one's driving skills rather than spending it on healthcare and education, and the same applies to members of the public, who would not want to squander their savings on same tests every year.
In fact, instead of obligatory driving tests annually, the best way to improve transportation security would be by upgrading road infrastructure and timely health check-ups of individuals. With regard to the former, most of the accidents on the highways happen due to poor road conditions. This situation could be improved by widening roads and not leaving any potholes open. Turning to health check-ups, after driving for several years, an individual could encounter serious health issues, such as weak eyesight, which could be a potential threat to driving as one can not see the signals on the road clearly which in turn results in accidents. Not only would this increase protection on highways, but it could also be beneficial for an individual.
In conclusion, road transportation safety could not be improved by undergoing driving tests annually. On the contrary, regular medical inspection and improving road infrastructure would improve safety aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ily on arranging test centers to access ones driving skills rather than spending it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19808306709 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89982525614 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527156549521 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7373872239 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196019060011 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891794665708 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642681060526 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1463309792 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486841380851 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.