Some people say we do not need printed papers newspaper anymore as there are other means. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, have many technology devices for many things in life so have many people believed that we don’t need printed press. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of this modern life don’t need papers. First, technology devices are believed serving people life among country’s rapid growth regardless of their family background, this technology support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall human capital knowledges of lower-income people but also make people can know any information when they are busy. By using technology devices such as mobile or tablets, nowadays, people, especially, older can able to keep in touch with their family or their friend, following newsletters regardless geographical distance !75 don’t need printed papers. Second, people don’t need printed papers would probably result in a greater existence of forest trees because papers made by tress, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged and environment human is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significantly than the minor benefits once people don’t have papers. First, offering all people don’t have papers would likely correspond with a tremendous no notepad strain on a country. Adults can using technology devices but children is very young and they can’t using electronic writing. Second, when people don’t using papers, people could become over- reliant on the technology for everything. Papers is the important part in this life, when people who are just learning to write can only using pencils and sticky notes so if they don’t have papers, children can’t write. Especially, people from lower-income and less privileged and they don’t have money to buy technology so if they don’t have papers, have many people can’t write. It, instead, would be a more technology viable option it the resources were focused on supporting job of people.
I were discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, I’m disagree with this argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'can't' requires base form of this verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...t children is very young and they can’t using electronic writing. Second, when people...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
...focused on supporting job of people. I were discussed both sides of the argument. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46607669617 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70574969991 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551622418879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8971925794 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112313576503 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426371134678 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370408333304 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721898546521 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297417907663 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.