Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of country is actually a development of technology. And with technological innovations and advances, more cutting-edge technologies will replace agriculture position, which change the proportion of a countries’ income. Therefore I disagree with the opinion that a country need to produce all the food for its citizens and limit its import on food.
On the one hand, people who advocate this point have their own reasons. Firstly, a powerful country need to satisfy their citizens’ requirement that cover the food, public facilities, social welfare and etc. Since food offer is a basic factor that influence people’s life, many people believe it is more safety for a country to develop its own food system and decrease the relying on other countries’ import. Moreover, limit food import can save government’s money so that more money could be used in improving education and medicine system which improve people’s life quality. Finally, decrease food importation also means more development chances for local food industry.
However, on the other hand, many agriculture production such as rice and corn are the important resource for industry. For example, the alcohol produce need loads of corn. Also some developing countries need to burn plants and produce electricity. Some countries, like Japan, have only little appropriate soil to grow plants, so they have to rely on food importation. To consider these conditions, many countries cannot rely on themselves. Another important thing is that some countries import rice and corn to produce alcohol and then sell it to other country to earn the money. So the food importation can also bring the benefit.
In conclusion, it also useful if governments spent money on food importation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...proportion of a countries' income. Therefore I disagree with the opinion that a coun...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...food, public facilities, social welfare and etc. Since food offer is a basic factor that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun agriculture seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much agriculture', 'a good deal of agriculture'.
Suggestion: much agriculture; a good deal of agriculture
...stry. However, on the other hand, many agriculture production such as rice and corn are th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...the alcohol produce need loads of corn. Also some developing countries need to burn ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48375451264 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08216154558 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6568255993 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33209280145 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116817893554 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913703001379 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196981339992 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686073823444 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.