some people thing that there should be some strict controls about noise. others think that they are could just make as much noise as they want. discuss both views
It is argue that some people could just make as much noise as they prefer. While I have to admit that this perspective is accurate to a somewhat extent. I still hold a notion that there should be stringent controls about loud by specific acts of Government is much more advantageous.
On the one hand, making noise belongs to freedom of speech, which is one of human rights. First of all, freedom of speech is granted by most of international law systems.
Therein, meeting is one of the activities, which cause much loud. Besides, some events very prefer and need much noise such as birthday celebration, singing contest or football match. For instance, in football match, audience should make loud as much as they can in order to raise up players’ fight spirit. At the same time, thanks to the development of science and technology, scientist invented material which can block out the noise.
On the other hand, others who are in favour of it is very necessary to restrict loud have their own justifications. As a matter of fact, noise has exterted an adverse impact on our life. noise could make serious influence for people’s health. Nowadays, noise pollution occurs at many countries specially developing countries which focuses on developing industry. The noise is produced by factories, constructions or vehicles. Living in a place that is too noisy in a long time cause some problems for health such as headaches, sleepless. Apart from this, educational institutions and offices could be effected by loud. students and officer will not be able to pay attention on their lecture or work. For instance, student will not be able to do exercises if his neighbours keep singing too loud.
To recapitulate, I am strongly convinced that although making noise is one of human rights, this ought to restrict so as to protect others rights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
It is argue that some people could just make as muc...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...just make as much noise as they prefer. While I have to admit that this perspective i...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('somewhat') instead an adjective, or a noun ('extent') instead of another adjective.
...it that this perspective is accurate to a somewhat extent. I still hold a notion that there shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Noise
...exterted an adverse impact on our life. noise could make serious influence for people...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence for people's health. Nowadays, noise pollution occurs at many countries...
^^
Line 13, column 626, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
... and offices could be effected by loud. students and officer will not be able to pay att...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 116, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...of human rights, this ought to restrict so as to protect others rights.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, still, while, apart from, as to, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02893890675 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81222754654 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588424437299 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2182402515 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3157894737 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279081351788 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080402723536 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995151544686 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148903496991 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104252788458 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.