Some people think that advertisements aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes believed that the government should impose a ban on advertisements that focus on young children. This essay strongly agrees with this suggestion as now will be discussed.
The first argument behind my belief is that a ban on ads focusing on children can help to reduce the adverse effects of these on children. This is because children don have enough ability to think independently and tend to imitate what they access on advertisements without thinking carefully.Therefore, bad advertisements can have negatively affect on metal health as well as behaviour of children. Advertisements of alcohol, for example, can be easily seen by children on YouTube. Consequently, children tend to buy alcohol and use resulting in affecting on studying and behaviour. This is why I believe that a ban on ads that focus on children can help to prevent the negative effects on them.
Another point worth mentioning is that children don not have fully aware so they can be easily attracted by the products on ads and spend money on buying them. However, not all families have enough economic conditions to purchase these products which can lead to family financial burden. For instance, children see advertisements of toys, if their parents do not buy, they will pester their parents in order to get these. This is why I believe that ads that aimed at children should be banned due to its detrimental effects.
In conclusion, I totally agree that the authorities should prohibit ads that focus on children given the aforementioned arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...vertisements without thinking carefully.Therefore, bad advertisements can have negatively...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'affected'.
Suggestion: affected
... bad advertisements can have negatively affect on metal health as well as behaviour of...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... bad advertisements can have negatively affect on metal health as well as behaviour of ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09448818898 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07580866134 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.208464833 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276393022575 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109189640022 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669195255756 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169470978037 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282865352404 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.