Some people believe that raising the minimum legal age for driving cars and motorcycles is the best way to ensure road safety. However, from my point of view, raising the minimum legal age is indeed one of the ways to improve road safety, but it is not the best. There are more effective ways.
To some extent, improving the minimum legal age is a way to keep road safety. But it cannot solve the problem of road safety very well. To begin with, raising the minimum driving age cannot bring enough experience to drivers. Even if the minimum driving age is increased, traffic accidents still easily happen because drivers are lack road experience and predictability of road conditions. Besides, increasing the minimum legal age for driving cars cannot change the psychological state of drivers. Some drivers are so confident that they do not obey the traffic orders, which brings great hidden dangers to road safety.
There are other better ways to improve road safety. Firstly, for the acts that threaten road safety, the government can impose strict penalties. By doing this, people will be more careful when driving cars and motorcycles, because unsafe driving will be severely punished. Additionally, improving road safety can also be achieved through regular road safety examine. For potential safety danger on the road, such as unreasonable design of traffic lights in a certain place, it should be investigated in time.
All in all, raising the legal driving age cannot change psychology of people and bring them experience. It is more effective to draw up strict penalty laws and investigate roads regularly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace, it should be investigated in time. All in all, raising the legal driving ag...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y laws and investigate roads regularly.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10902255639 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55312983056 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4260416509 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421338281761 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151774386361 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110282013754 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262635673311 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996096951939 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.