Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the optimal method of making roads more secure is to raise the legal driving age. While this may work to a certain extent, I would argue that there are superior ways to curb traffic accidents.
It is understandable why some people advocate banning young people from driving. The key rationale in favor of this view is that young drivers tend to be reckless, which may result in accidents. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies this situation. Many Vietnamese youngsters disregard traffic laws and commit serious offences such as running red lights on a daily basis, contributing to the escalating rate of traffic-related injuries and casualties. Therefore, it seems sensible that this group of drivers be banned from the road.
However, I believe the aforementioned measure may be futile in the long run. As reckless driving occurs both among the old and the young, increasing the legal driving age may not be a holistic approach to the problem of accidents. Instead, governments should adopt more viable solutions to reduce accidents. One of these is to administer stricter punishments on people who violate traffic laws. For example, authorities could raise the fines on traffic offenders or suspend their driver’s license indefinitely. Another solution is to allocate more funding to improving road infrastructures. This is because accidents not only stem from bad driving but also subpar standards of roadways.
In conclusion, while there may be reasons to support increasing the legal age for driving cars and riding motorbikes, I believe that the proposed solutions would be better in boosting road safety.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32432432432 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95554234315 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617760617761 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.129056975 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196170111584 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589171825126 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727942659021 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140850129278 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748300178365 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.