Some people think that the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel for cars and other vehicles. Do you agree or disagree?
As the global environmental problems have been aggravating over recent years, some analysts opine that exaggerating the price of fuel would be the appropriate solution. However, in my opinion, I would dissent to this notion because other solutions would be more effective regarding this crisis.
To commence with, it is undeniable that fuel price impacts on the cost of other essential commodities. One good illustration of this is that when the fuel rate of the global market rises rapidly, the price of local products automatically follows an upward trend. Eventually, it will be an extreme burden for the impoverished as well as middle-class families.
Secondly, other reasons such as industrial and chemical wastage, solid wastage, electronic wastage, and household wastage are also responsible for the global environmental disaster. The main reasons behind these issues are uncontrolled industrialization, imprudent human activities and so on. Therefore, the authority should more focus on these complications particularly rather than abating the fuel rate.
However, it is evident that exacerbating the cost of fuel will be efficacious to mitigate the threat of global environmental dangers. because it will decline the number of car ownership. As a result, carbon dioxide gas or other dangerous gases that are responsible for poor air quality will be alleviated potentially. Nonetheless, this endeavor would be beneficial only for developing countries where the citizen from developed countries will be able to somehow manage to overcome this.
In conclusion, expanding the cost of fuel will be a helpful initiative to solve the global environmental crisis only for particular cases but, the government should prioritize the real causes of global environmental problems more precisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ished as well as middle-class families. Secondly, other reasons such as industri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...threat of global environmental dangers. because it will decline the number of car owner...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...threat of global environmental dangers. because it will decline the number of car owner...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73431734317 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1930271179 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2999209738 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179851435722 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652524631531 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459411165029 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104362166822 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026898799496 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.