It is often said that the mode of transportation is a controversial topic in the current generation either some people believe car utilization is the best in urban areas, whereas their counterparts think bicycle transportation form is finer. This essay discusses both sides of the argument, followed by my view.
On the one hand, It is said that the selection of car transportation might make a more comfortable journey. Many commuters prefer a car to travel to reach their places fresh without any sweating. Besides, more than two passengers could travel, and precious time could be saved while driving fast. Furthermore, emergency problems can be tackled by car transportation. To elaborate, most of the people choose vehicles such as cars in emergencies like seeking medical attention and attending essential functions. Therefore, it seems that to access a comfortable journey and medical attention, car transportation method is better.
On the other hand, it is often said that the selection of the bicycle as a mode of transportation might be environmentally-friendly. Cycles generate zero-emission of Co2, carbon, nitrogen, and other harmful toxins into the atmosphere, which safeguards the environment. Moreover, the cycling method improves the health of the individual, such as preventing heart complications and obesity issues, conversely, physical fitness would increase. The WHO study revealed that last year nearly 50% of health issues reduction had been observed in a team of cyclists in Sydney, Australia. Thus, the form of bicycle transportation helps immensely to the environment as well as society.
Having considered both sides of the debate, even though car travel leads a peaceful and the fastest journey to reach the desired destinations, preference of bicycle as a mode of transportation becomes environmentally-friendly and improves the individual health, so, I believe bicycles are the best.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55442176871 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53769131574 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1882018471 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217151469179 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645236310801 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496932850399 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135660989925 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614562528134 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.