Some people think that cars should be banned in big city centres. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people say that governments should introduce a law to prohibit cars in metropolises. In my opinion, I completely agree with this for two main reasons. First, the restriction towards cars would lessen the negative impact on the environment and second, it contributes to road safety.
Cars are commonly known as machines including a dozen of different technologies, moving wheels and gears. In order to power them, fuels such as petroleum and diesel are of necessity, ensuring cars’ function. However, this accordingly poses a problem to the environment because of the constant amount of toxic gases released into the atmosphere, which not only worsens the air quality but it also contributes to such environmental problems as global warming. Thus, the ban on cars would improve this situation because the fewer cars hit the streets, the lesser the number of toxic gases will be released into the atmosphere.
Apart from the reason expressed above, the effect of banning cars is also beneficial to road safety because of the reduced accidents on the streets. In many developed city centres nowadays, the usage of cars among citizens is becoming evident. For example, cars in Ho Chi Minh city often account for 80% of all vehicles. This, however, increases the rate of many heart-wrenching accidents occurred to unfortunate drivers and pedestrians because people are more likely to face the risk of dangers when heading off the streets. Therefore, the restriction on cars would prevent this probability from happening in the first place, and people would no longer concern the threat of fatal accidents.
In conclusion, the opinion about whether cars should be prohibited in big centres or not is different among people’s perspective. I think that it would improve the environment and reduce the risk of accidents.
- Many people disagree with the school about forcing children to learn new languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 84
- Some people think that cars should be banned in big city centres. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2866894198 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89470099949 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9977990722 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232468976164 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780861452461 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604846029652 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147580016 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436681494771 0.056905535591 77% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.