Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that crime is always a very hot problem but now, the ways to find effective remedies for sinners is a more difficult issue. It is said that offenders should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. Personally, I totally strike a blow for this.
First of all, nobody in the world is perfect, sometimes they are wrong. Therefore, depending on the seriousness, they should be forgiven and given another chance to turn over a new leaf. Moreover, not every criminals is bad. Some commited fenolies due to their miserable fate. For example, a teenager stole money from a store because his sister was ill and she needed to be operated on. That is why he was put into jail. Maybe, he deserves a second opportunity to alter his life.
Apart from that, when sinners are allowed to do unpaid work such as: cleaning streets, planting trees and so on, they will have chance to experience things that they have never tried before. As a result, offenders will appreciate labor as well as regret having done wrong deeds in the past. They are likely to do good things when they are free. Everybody around can change their thoughts about these sinners. For instance, in " Healer"- a very famous Korean film and my most favourite film, there is a man who had been sentenced to seven years in prison for stealing. However, by being given chance to take part in unpaid jobs, he understood a lot of meaningful things. After being released, he works at a coffee shop and becomes a friendly and kind-hearted person. Naturally, miracles have occured to those who used to do evils.
To sum up, I think that offenders should be given chance to do community work instead of being put behind bars. This will make great contribution to decrease sinners in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | ammaracca | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Jermankell | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | lily2002 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | ratnumohit | 73 | view |
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty. How can this be solved? 73
- With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if eating too regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is to ban it completely To what extent do you agree 96
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Many people now undertake extreme activities from hang gliding to mountain climbing Why do people risk their lives in this way and do you think this is a good trend Give reasons for your answer and include an 84
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries What are the causes of this What solutions can be offered 78
- There is a fact that a number of parents now increasingly desire to send their children to study oversea What are the reasons for this trend 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69936708861 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47696283716 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7294560233 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.25 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306280165945 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840481589092 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15337910995 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221246736095 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11607578928 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.