Politicians around the world are struggling to reduce the crime rate, ratcheting up efforts to ensure that it is declined to a negligible level. It is often suggested by some experts that rather than incarcerating the offenders, their services should be utilized for the welfare of society. In my view, there is no harm in taking the services of criminals provided they are not set free and confined to stay on certain premises.
Set criminals free simply in return for volunteer work would have unwanted repercussions. According to legal experts, imprisoning the offenders in jail is one of the deterrent steps, which has been taken globally to curb the crime rate. If wrongdoers know that the only consequence of their illegal activities is to perform unpaid work, they would fearlessly remain involved in such heinous acts. Such mild punishment would ultimately lead to an increase in crime incidents.
There is no doubt that criminals could be used constructively for the betterment of society. Firstly, those imprisoned in jail could be transferred to a place where they can serve humanity. In other words, rather than placing them in traditional jails, those convicted could be confined to old houses to serve the elderly. Similarly, there is an opportunity to deploy them in foster homes to teach children or provide sports training. Finally, they could be used as a volunteer to work in hospitals to serve debilitated patients.
To conclude, the most pragmatic approach to punish the criminals while reaping the benefits of their service at the same time is to confine them to places where their services could be used effectively
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, similarly, so, while, no doubt, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83118634972 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594795539033 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9838109735 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108595550331 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399631881907 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348156398997 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619239955998 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249642868505 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.