Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people more freedom However others think the cheap air flight should be banned because it pollutes the air and brings many other problems Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people more freedom. However, others think the cheap air flight should be banned because it pollutes the air and brings many other problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Recently, an economic issue related to cheap air flights has been widely discussed among people the world over. Some argue that they should be encouraged, the opposite opinion is we must ban these flights. As far as environment, technology, economy, and globalization are concerned, I strongly hold that cheap air flight is indispensable.
On the one hand, to begin with, burning fossil fuels would pollute the air seriously. According to a recent survey, four million people die each year from diseases linked to environmental problems. Furthermore, the emission of greenhouse gas is one of the causes of global sea-level rise. It would endanger hundreds of species. The whole ecosystem may be harmed badly by cheap air flights.
On another hand, it is undeniable that cheap air flight is harmful to the environment. However, these damages may be reduced with the development of technology. We now have the electronic car, hence, we may have the electronic plane in the near future. Which do not harm nature. In addition, with the expansion of globalization, the number of individuals who are even in need also need to fly abroad is increasing. For example, my neighbor Yu Qian whose nickname is Poverty needs to flight to abroad because he attended an exhibition on body art so that he can earn 50 dollars.
In conclusion, cheap air flights should be condoned rather than condemned as long as we could update the relative technologies to reduce the harm to nature. Many people could profit from the cheap air flight so we should not ban them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he electronic plane in the near future. Which do not harm nature. In addition, with t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, may, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97683397683 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83486567232 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1043713732 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305045069605 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983343448568 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097356306498 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203793605739 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938094951546 0.056905535591 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.