Some people think that countryside life is healthier while others believe that city is better in order to have a healthy lifestyle. Discuss both views with your own perception.
Lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades. Some masses ponder that rural areas, farms and villages are an ideal place to dwell. However, others believe that living in urbanized set ups is more lucrative to have a better life. Here I would like to account for both the views with my own opinion.
There are manifold points to support the former view. Initially, rural lifestyle bestows individuals with the opportunity to stay close to nature in a healthy environment. To justify, it is believed that people who reside in such areas can relish a nourishing life as they breathe in fresh air, consume more of organic foods and are also free from the hustle bustle of the city life. These factors are undoubtedly a key to a wholesome life. Therefore, countryside living is overall fruitful in order to avail best of life. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
Now numerous points can put down to shore up the latter view. The recent advancements in technology have uplifted the standard of living in urban places. To elaborate, metro lifestyle offers supreme amenities such as paved roads, shopping malls, organized transportation system and structured educational institutes which certainly add quality in the lives of the masses. Moreover, unlimited employment opportunities in the cities is also a worthwhile factor to make metropolis a more favorable place for its dwellers as the cities help them to fulfill all their needs and desires to uplift their standard of life.
From my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, both towns and urban sectors might be offering equal conveniences or the drawbacks for its residents. However, I still believe that in order to prosper and succeed in life, metro societies are much more lucrative as compared to countryside living.
To recapitulate, it can be simply stated that choosing a place to live should be prioritized pertaining to individuals’ requirements and their career choices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ires to uplift their standard of life. From my notion, both aspects have their ...
^^^
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... requirements and their career choices.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22670807453 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90191925678 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.7449569131 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254123214363 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717897054008 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541521997798 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129681777051 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084547747907 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.