Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is certainly true to say that work is worship. Presently, a proportion of people believe that working in the same organization for the entire working life is beneficial. Others ponder that changing jobs and companies as well is more fruitful than staying in the same job for ever. In this essay, I would like to account for both the views and with my own perception.
There are multifarious points to throw light on the former view. First and foremost, it is more lucrative for people to spend all of their working years in the same place. In this way, they could gain precious experience while successfully facing all the thick and thin situations at their workplace. As a result, individuals can eventually attain ample respect and appreciation in their jobs. Moreover, long working years in the same institution will probably lead to financial stability. To justify, salary often increases if a person prefers to stay in the same job for several years. Therefore, stability in work is crucial in order to live a better and secure life. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
Numerous points can be mentioned to support the latter view. Initially, they argue that indulging in different jobs definitely enhance the skill set and experience of masses. As people work in the numerous places, they ultimately acquire plenty of efficient skills and techniques that widen their working scope. Hence, they are more likely to avail optimum opportunities due to their talent and adapting nature. Furthermore, some people consider that staying in the same job for long time is boring and they are more satisfied in case they change their professions time to time. Thus, meeting new people and facing different challenges could break the routine and make people happy and amused.
From my notion, both the views have their own significance. We can neither support nor go against either of the sides. However, I still believe that spending the maximum working years in the same organization is more valuable than working in different places.
To recapitulate, it can be stated that changing jobs or sticking with the same organization both have their own advantages and every person should select any of them depending on his interest and circumstances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09115281501 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71788519393 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538873994638 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0066745719 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3181818182 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413206530371 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11337218509 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976538598844 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233253828212 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990986261326 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.