Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale with others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale with others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.

Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Environmental issues are highly concern recently. While there are some benefits to solve the problems nationally, I would argue that it is better if countries join hands together.

The option to deal with environmental issues individually does have its merit. The general idea is this option will provide the flexibility on how to tackle the problems. For example, in China air pollution is mostly caused by vehicles’ emission. However, the culprit create air pollution in Germany is the industrial’s emission. Each country will need a different plan on reducing the emission in this case. The ...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (7 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ore likely to be effective in practice. The greatest advantage of this idea is the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... greatest advantage of this idea is the resources extension. Undeveloped countries can ga...
^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'as a result']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250764525994 0.247107183377 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.177370030581 0.155533422707 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0733944954128 0.0946595960268 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0642201834862 0.0501214627716 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0214067278287 0.0437548338989 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110091743119 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0366972477064 0.0403226058552 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03641589436 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0305810397554 0.0326793684256 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103975535168 0.0861772015684 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0244648318043 0.021408717616 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00917431192661 0.011925033212 77% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1808.0 1933.35771543 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 316.048096192 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.34385964912 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.374742101984 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315789473684 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235087719298 0.203846283523 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.185964912281 0.137316102897 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03641589436 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.037074148 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.56093040696 106% => OK
Word variations: 63.9235509402 60.7387585426 105% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.7647058824 20.7743622355 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.707500176 49.517814964 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.352941176 127.492653851 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7743622355 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.814263465372 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 48.3436532508 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.51162790698 1.69124875643 89% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213687416395 0.332605444948 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0904946534717 0.102741220458 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0730892393346 0.0668466124924 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521375399827 0.534860350844 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169194309254 0.148594505496 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834438150038 0.134430193775 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609926071794 0.0742795772207 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.303252633492 0.324371583561 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.115946097269 0.0638462369009 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171761070457 0.228012699653 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428956163624 0.058150111329 74% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Although it is sometimes thought that global planning needs for untangling problems existed in environment, other people claim that each nations ought to tackle with those problems separately, In my opinion, I consider that addressing globally have more effective impact on environment.
On the one hand, some people think global planning is necessary to have sustainable resources which have been vital for surviving humans over the world and I agree. In other words, due to Integration of earth, setting convenient rules globally, which are along the environment and nature on the earth, helps utilizing of resources will be optimized so not only humans can have better and reliable life but also habitats of other creatures are greatly protected. For example cutting trees in one area of world can be effected on other parts by changing the amount of raining or temperature which definitely have more negative consequences for humans and others. Furthermore, as some developing countries do not have enough awareness of implement, which are proved have dangerous results in futures, such as using saline water in irrigation that is going to destroy soil structure and ground water quality.
On the other hand, it is often believe that individual responsibilities are mandatory part of struggling with huge problems as a result its really prominence that each countries should have specially rules related to situations of natural resources' in their area to conservation of environment. As it known some countries such as Iran are really drought and confined precipitation comparison with European countries and it needs divers addressing actually They believe that environmental conditions in every area are different from each other. In addition managing limited programs is by far the easiest and less cost in compare to globally programs so the implementation of them have more qualify .
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that solving environmental problems in large scale as much as globe have more positive consequences for humans and other creatures who live on the earth.