Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that celebrities can make problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The attention of famous people to significant problems may lead to an ethical dilemma. Some people argue that celebrities’ attention encourages the people to come to the aid of these organizations in order to deal with problems, which I firmly agree with and will discuss it further in the next paragraph, whereas the opponents of this idea maintain the position that celebrities lack the motivation and the ability to perfectly reflect the importance of the situation which may eventually distract the public furthermore.
On one hand, famous individuals with their effect on the public can encourage people to spend more time and money to address crucial problems. It is mainly for this reason, that this cluster not only are observed by numerous people in the real world but are also followed by millions of users on social media. For instance, they invite people to join a donation, therefore, their fans allocate an immense amount of money immediately and passionately to contribute to what their role models ask them. Hence, people who have a specific impact on people and are popular ought to take responsibility and action for such a purpose.
On the other hand, the contribution of celebrities may push people to focus on famous people rather than problems. In other words, people by nature have a strong tendency to communicate with people who are more prosperous and popular, thus, if organizations invite famous people to their charity, the public may be drawn to attend the charity. For example, people in these meetings participate soulfully just to take a picture and give a signature from celebrities. To sum up, although celebrities attract people to aid organizations, people just notice them and forget the main aim.
In conclusion, though famous people cause distraction in some organizations, they can be the prime reason why people participate in such activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1986970684 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90174450433 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.2617548335 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.090909091 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1818181818 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300616980338 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122773671574 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551139519975 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189590366221 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483564440582 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.