Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays an immense amount of budget is considered for wild animals' habitats. Some people argue that these animals deserve such a tremendous amount of money, which I firmly agree with and will discuss it further in the next paragraph, whereas the opponents of this idea maintain the position that it is better to allocate this time and money to ourselves, aka humans.
On the one hand, the conservation of wild animals contributes to our pleasure of nature. For instance, a large group of people annually take a trip to nature to see rare animals, living in eye-catching sceneries. Therefore, if money is not injected for such a purpose, people will lose this opportunity to admire the beauty of nature and wild animals. Besides, in a safe environment, animals will breed safely and this breeding procedure alone could result in the protection of their species. Due to these reasons, this practical approach provides superb benefits to animals as well as humans.
On the other hand, humans play the main role in damaging the environment and its inhabitants. It is chiefly for this reason that we continue to construct factories, which emit their fumes in nature, bring numerous detrimental side effects to animals as well as our own. Although these buildings exert positive influences on civilization, they also have grave effects such as ruining animals' homes. Last but not least, besides factories, cars emit exhaust fumes which leads to global warming, hence, polar bears are confronted with extinction. So, thanks to modern human constructions, some animals are faced with negative environmental problems.
In conclusion, however we ought to spend time and money to address wild animals' problems, we are the first and foremost reason for their problems and therefore we have to take responsibility and action to protect them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19191919192 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76350788289 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7797572063 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.615384615 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278561074187 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888394154766 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711322057983 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170544631026 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826098518619 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.