some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages?
Nowadays, some may agree that profit-making companies should not run medical services for people’s health. However other contend that private hospitals can bring us a large number of advantages. In this essay, I will examine both side of the debate and seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that if some residents choose profit-making companies instead of government hospital, patients can be treated as fast as possible. If private hospitals are allowed, the number of hospital will increase sharply and people have more choice. As a result, patient don’t need to wait for a long time to see the doctor and be treated quickly. In addition, the set of private hospitals is beneficial to facing emergencies. With private hospitals established, residents could find hospital easily.
On the other hand, nonetheless there is a big problem that profit-making companies may just force on making money and ignore the quality of services. In order to make profits, less and less money will be used to improve the quality of facility. It is obvious that poor facility has no help for cure the patient and lead to much more serious disease. Furthermore, profit-making companies run medical services do harm to health care. The price of the service will get higher to make more money, although some one can’t afford it especially poor people.
To summarize, there is no doubt that private hospitals can solve the problem that hard to see the doctor and have advantage on emergencies. At the same time, however private hospitals may even make health worse. Therefore, I can safely conclude that the advantages of private care outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | tvda1711 | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-24 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 11 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...end that private hospitals can bring us a large number of advantages. In this essay, I will exami...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...get higher to make more money, although some one can't afford it especially poor pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, in addition, no doubt, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16544117647 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88120616067 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8344898172 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.8125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290214542967 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100632010837 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111369852317 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182598299015 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493311912338 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.