Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country's development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It cannot be denied that science is among the factors for the development of a country. There is an argument that science should be invested more than other majors at schools and universities. In my opinion, I tend to believe that investment on other subjects is equally important.
Life of human has changed positively thanks to the rapid growth of science and technology. On personal respective, science created a favorable condition for human to have a convenient life. For instance, laptops deal with tasks faster and more efficient than human. Moreover, science also contribute to the development of countries such as Japan and the US by boosting the resident's productivity. Although science has advantages, it does not mean it is the only factor that promote modern life. In other words, each individual demands receiving a well-rounded education, merely knowledge of technology.
Apart from that, students will likely to ignore other subjects if science is the only major which is put money on by government. They tend to pay little attention to subjects as they think these subjects are useless and impractical. For example, history is believed to be useless and dull. As a consequence, pupils may not have the full understanding of the world around. In addition, the role of non-science teacher might be affected. These teacher will not be recognized. As a result, parents will also show a negative attitude toward the teachers.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that despite the positive contribution of science to countries' progress, other subjects still affect to a country and the authorities should put money equally on each majors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...uch as Japan and the US by boosting the residents productivity. Although science has adva...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 437, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this teacher' or 'These teachers'?
Suggestion: This teacher; These teachers
... non-science teacher might be affected. These teacher will not be recognized. As a result, pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3007518797 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93712014899 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575187969925 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9197490763 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9411764706 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245339881647 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06996620586 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542931974897 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159208262597 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517699414961 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.