Some people think that the governments should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that governments around the world need to put more money on education which involves in science in order to develop their countries. While scientific education is important for a nation’s development, I disagree that investing only in teaching science is enough.
There are several reasons why people think the governments should focus on teaching science. Firstly, since technology has become more advanced for the past decades in every occupation, countries’ leaders need more science products or innovation if they do not want to be left behind by other nations. Therefore, it is a good idea to invest in education of science to meet governments’ future goals. Secondly, there is a majority of population that intends to take science classes when enrolling in colleges or universities. Because of such tendency, governments have to put money on science to meet the demands of the residents.
However, teaching science is not the only way to prosper nations’ success. Instead, there are some other subjects that need the leaders’ attention. The economy of a country is based on international trading which requires people with good social and communication skills. Such abilities can be taught in language classes. Consequently, investing in these classes will provide more excellent people in trading field which eventually brings profit to the country. In addition, military is another aspect that governments need to focus on. In order to form strong armies, countries’ leaders may want to put their money on physical exercise subjects in schools so that they can have more healthy and strong people in the line-ups.
In conclusion, while science has caught more attention from the governments, I believe sharing budget to other subjects is also helping the countries’ development and progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y and strong people in the line-ups. In conclusion, while science has caught mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48263888889 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13304327546 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8965019243 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.266666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342301952485 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10787561802 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655677447982 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209745012725 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262122574451 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.