Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Ancient art and culture resemble the country’s history and heritage. It is often argued by some people that government must not spend money in encouraging culture, art, and traditions. While others are of the opinion that it is advantageous for the society. However, it is important for a nation to protect their culture. So, in my opinion, the government should support art and cultural activities.
To begin with, for any country there are many concerns about poverty, health care, and education which are to be solved on priority. So, the government should focus more on activities which benefit the public rather than funding for arts and cultures. India, for example, has 1000’s of citizens who die of hunger each day. Authorities should take necessary action against this starvation. Besides this, Education is the basic right that government needs to provide to the children. It helps societies run smoothly. Next, Population health is also crucial for a country, free medical check-ups for women and children are to be provided by the governments. Hence, after allocating enough budgets to education, health, and food, the government can redirect the remaining funds to promote arts and culture.
On the other hand, culture and art signify the traditions and practices of a country. They contribute to the growth of the economy and generate revenue in several ways like tourism. For instance, there are several ancient monuments in India like 1000 pillars temple in Warangal which attract visitors and money gained from tourists can be used to develop infrastructures like news roads and airports. It reveals the history and can be preserved as a treasure for future generations. So, there is a need to safeguard arts and cultural activities by the government.
In conclusion, there are several essential problems for the government to be dealt like education, health, and hunger, government-funding must be done more in this direction, and in my opinion, it is more beneficial to concentrate on public benefits instead of arts and culture.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91521451453 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.607214481 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5789473684 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3684210526 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174877625347 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520440406221 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519276688239 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113893968934 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254650396196 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.