Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
The arts are now one of the most controversial issues that people like debating about. However, some people assume that the government shouldn't waste money to promote the arts. But I totally disagree about this opinion. The government should encourage the arts nationally.
To begin with, the arts of human have been progressing from ancient era. Some experts announced that they discovered ancients drawing. It showed that human made arts and enjoy it from a long time ago. Until nowadays, people frequently go to enjoy the arts such as cinema, exhibition, musical etc. Furthermore, the advance of the arts also enables economy to progress nationally. Because, it the arts of a country be popular and famous, it will bring an increase of the country's image. The better image of the country will allow the number of tourists to increase consequently. As a result, the country will be able to earn numerous tourism profits. For instance, if the arts are developed, it is totally natural that plenty of entertainments, such as musical, exhibitions, will appear and a number of tourists will visit to enjoy those.
Meanwhile, as some people believe that the arts is not important, there are some disadvantages as well. If the government consume vast budget to encourage the arts, other parts of departments might regress relatively, such as science, healthcare etc.
In conclusion, some people may believe that consuming to encourage the arts is wasting budget. Nevertheless, I believe that the arts are significant important and the government should invest for the arts. Because, the humans have been finding out happiness by the arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... some people assume that the government shouldnt waste money to promote the arts. But I ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... government should invest for the arts. Because, the humans have been finding out happi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18045112782 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8185261303 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3766385366 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5555555556 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7777777778 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221434928656 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070565838854 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556599169632 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142793499811 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062224802297 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.