In many cities, security measures, such as the use of video cameras in public places,are being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?
The crime problems are now one of the most controversial issues that people like debating about. Every governments are concerned to diminish the crime rate. One of their solutions is installation of camera in public place, such as street, road, park, etc. However, some people assumed that installing numerous cameras in public place may invade the privacy of people. But, I believe that the government should install a lot of cameras in order to reduce the crime rate.
To begin with, the crime rate have been increasing from the past, because the social have been becoming complicated increasingly, and most people are under pressure and getting stressed at work, school and even at home. Thus, installing camera in public place is the best method so that the country decrease the crime rate. There are plenty of advantages to set cameras up. Firstly, the government can make a influence with less cost and labor, compared with hiring more people for securing. It is definitely impossible that the government hire more polices to prevent crime due to a budget limit. Furthermore, it is considered by many that security is more important nowadays, because of terrorism.
Meanwhile, other people believe that installing tons of cameras will invade privacy of people. For instance, many people are feeling uncomfortable and that it is invading privacy and freedom, due to appearance of numerous cameras on the street. Hence, they announced that the government should eliminate cameras to save privacy of citizens.
In conclusion, Recently, many people lost their life, because, many crimes, terrorism, accidents results in this situation. For that reason, although there are tons of people who disagree about installing a number of cameras in public place, I totally assert that the benefit of increased security surpass demerits. Because, I assume that it is the best solution to prevent crime and terrorism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...issues that people like debating about. Every governments are concerned to diminish t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...as up. Firstly, the government can make a influence with less cost and labor, com...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24755700326 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6785782974 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530944625407 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9905044283 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7647058824 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234124224105 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749617183755 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441353464152 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144700555465 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295133371907 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.