he chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how the figure of minutes (in billions) of UK telephone calls varied in three categories which are local - fixed line, national and international - fixed line, mobiles (all calls) between 1995 and 2002.
To begin with, it can be clearly seen that there were more users who used telephone for local than others. Furthermore, it had been remaining steadily from 1995 to 2002. However, the gap between the number of local and others had been narrowing gradually until 2002.
Meanwhile, the figure of local was increasing at approximately 71 in 1995 and it had reached at 90 in 1999 eventually. It was also the biggest figure in the bar chart. On the other hand, it began to diminish in 2000 and it decreased by around 71 again. In contrast, there were only increase in the number of national and international, mobiles. The figure of national and international had risen up stably from about 36 to 61 between 1995 and 2002. The number of mobile also grew up consistently but this case was different a little. It had been rising up slightly until 1999 but it started to expand dramatically in 2000. Consequently, it reached by approximately 45 in 2002.
In conclusion, as time goes by, people began to prefer to use telephone for national and international calls and mobile calls. Thus, the number of mobiles and national and international had increased significantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93191489362 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90925133771 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527659574468 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0885057665 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7857142857 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155571491798 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532277713175 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501841112788 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106202259702 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561273677423 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.