Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.to what extent do you agree with this view?
It is considered by some that government is squandering funds on arts instead that funds could be used elsewhere in a better way. From my point of view, I completely disagree with the statement because art symbolizes the nation's identity and it is as important as any other sector of the country.
To begin with, people often associate themselves with art in the form of food, dance, drama, literature, norms, custom, and traditions. Moreover, on international level countries represents themselves through arts. So, the government must allocate funds to promote their distinctiveness through art. This can be done by arranging various art festivals. They not only foster the individuality of the nation but also cater to the need for revenue generation. For instance, the Arts Council of Pakistan arranges Koocha-I-Saqafat to encourage cultural art of all the provinces of Pakistan.
Secondly, art sector is inter-related with other sectors as well as maintaining the museums increases the trend of tourism in a country, whereas, tourist also required accommodation to stay. Due to the fact, the price of property rose as the demand increases in the property. Furthermore, tourists mostly loved to experience local food taste, which also contributes to making a profit in the hospitality industry. A recent study conducted by Queens University shows that investment in museums increases the GDP rate by 23% in Australia. Hence, art sector is also contributing to a country economic division.
In conclusion, arts play a significant role in the prospering country. It is the art through which people of the country recognized besides this it is as essential as any other sector of the country. The government should promote their individuality by heading events internationally
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...he statement because art symbolizes the nations identity and it is as important as any ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uting to a country economic division. In conclusion, arts play a significant r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3665480427 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1728448498 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8789722437 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178938956267 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562677226146 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550898707661 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115278080559 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520059823175 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.