We live in an era where people often argue on the money topic, discussing where the government should spend them and why a large part of that import goes on the arts. In my opinion, the state should divide the money differently, giving priority on other subjects.
Firstly, the government should invest money on the development of technology, studying more the interaction between humans and computers, building the basis for a simplification of our daily life. Secondly, invest in renewable energy is a great idea to reduce pollution and maintain individual good health and a more clean planet. Thirdly and last, the state should provide more funding for school, sciences and medicine, because without the right education and research the population is not prepared for possible future problems, as new illnesses, wars and global warming.
On the other hand, arts are a big part of our history and take care of our heritage is a remarkable way to have the opportunity to study construction and painting techniques and understand the way of thinking and problem solving of people from the past. Prevent like this the remake of old mistakes. Moreover, protecting the arts and promotion the museums and monuments internationally can produce a major entrance of money for the country thanks tourism.
In conclusion, the government should divide equally the founding into different sectors, spending in arts with the purpose and the idea of earning more money which will then be invested not only on the preservation of this letter but also in research and innovation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15625 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79882744352 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60546875 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5236148174 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6666666667 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18023239541 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696518066261 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497815688647 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110804966044 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506829811195 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.