Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion.
Since time immemorial, there is a controversy whether prior actions and decisions of mankind should be studied or not so as to deep comprehension of this millennium. This essay elaborates both views, along with a personal one.
To commence with, some people opine that there is almost nothing to do with history when it comes to its relation to the present. Indeed, it is true that studying history may waste precious time of people who, in turn, favor spending it to work on general theories and ideas in order to make breakthroughs providing a clear picture of life. I see eye to eye that up-to-date inventions have been made owing to what I had provided before. Taking Tesla as an example, one can conclude that e-cars are the result of modern knowledge and do not need the study of the past. According to this reason, those who argue with advocates of history analysis believe that the role of history is no longer important as it was before.
However, there is a bigger picture of what history analysts know. People have been using all objects based on the experiments, methods, and research of great scholars. To be more specific, it is absurd to neglect the importance of studying history as prior generations had been exploring new aspects of any concept through learning it. It makes it clear that humans should never underestimate the value of the decisions our ancestors made. Thus, those who oppose the former view holders claim that history explains the ups and downs of life in any field.
In conclusion, there has been an interesting approach to the view that we either have to review records or not as long as both are valid. I believe that even though Tesla is making such progress without studying the chronicles of the prior times, it has been using all basic theories written in school subjects, which are the outcome of the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ons of mankind should be studied or not so as to deep comprehension of this millennium. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77639751553 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54407541963 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574534161491 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4731058378 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154891042159 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502116662043 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405428242006 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807311691126 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553430448061 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.