Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

There is a fool statement given that we should learn to live along with climate change without trying to tackle this. I entirely contradict with this statement as it can be a reason of distinction of human being.

To begin with, we made this world unlivable for us by emitting toxic gases from factories, industries, and from vehicles into the air. Those gases are creating more carbon di oxide which create resistance in the ozone layer for the coming sunrise to get it back It making our globe warmer which is resulted in the malting of Ice burgs and rising the sea level nearly 4 feet. Consequently, the coastal area can go under water and the inhabitant of that place would lost their homeland, jobs, and income. Moreover, the global warming is a threat to some animals. For example, white bear cannot survive without the ice. If all ice is melted, there will be no place remain where they can live. Thus, they will extinct and the ecology will fall in danger.

On the other hand, provided that we donot take any action to lessen the change of climate we, the homo sapience, will fall in the threat of being destroy. To illustrate, lets consider, all nations stay silence from doing anything against the alteration. With days, all the ice will be melted, sea level will jump and sink all of the coastal areas and there's people, and all the land will go under sea water, eventually, we will die.

In conclution, trying to cope up with the climate change will be a fooling idea and can resulted in the extinction of whole human being. Thus, it should be stopped at any cost.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
... and the inhabitant of that place would lost their homeland, jobs, and income. Moreo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...be melted, sea level will jump and sink all of the coastal areas and theres people, and al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...p and sink all of the coastal areas and theres people, and all the land will go under ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60424028269 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2912244975 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4398383842 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129581838952 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483445171731 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380565302346 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869268499976 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192607667868 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.