Some people think it is effective for students to study in groups on school while others think it is better to study alone. Discuss the both sides and give your own opinion.
It is very common that people have many different opinions about education. Some people argue that learning involves a large number of group activities, while others opposite the idea. Personally, I believe team work is a key part in schooling.
Some parents and teachers think pupils should study alone because of two reasons. Firstly, students can foster their ability of solving problems by independently overcoming the difficulties that they need to face in the learning process. They create distinctive ideas in the process and become more creative. Secondly, studying as a group is more likely to cause the argument among students and inefficiency of solutions. Usually, the teenagers easily have conflicts with others in team discussion because they are not mature enough to accept the different opinions. As a result, a team sometimes do not have a comprehensive resolution for a complicated assignment.
On the other hand, I believe studying group plays an important role in modern education. It is evident that the most vital personality of many successful entrepreneurs or politicians is communication and expression skills instead of personal intelligence or professional skills. As a result, tutors should train their students’ communicative ability from group activities. Also, students can understand their drawbacks in a team discussion. For instance, a graduate student can realize the disadvantages of his essay through an academic workshop. They learn more knowledge from others’ criticism.
In conclusion, although some people might do not encourage children to study in groups, I still believe exchanging ideas and having positive interaction in a team is beneficial to students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
It is very common that people have many different opinions about education. Some people a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ome people argue that learning involves a large number of group activities, while others opposite...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62307692308 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17305594399 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4057665066 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229272233226 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067709813126 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559559600259 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130805558285 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246676467922 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.