Some people think it is a good thing for senior managers to have much higher salaries than the other workers in a company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The proper distribution of wage to employees has always been a topic of heated debate and disagreement. An opinion exists that workers in high positions should receive a salary above than other colleagues. Although I believe that excellent compensation is valuable for hired hands, elevated payment for top managers is also significant.
One the one hand, the labor of all workers must be paid according to their dignity. Salary is a huge incentive for the superior performance of their duties and the achievement of goals. Furthermore, if people work heavily and obtain poor wages, their productivity will decline rapidly. For example, according to the magazine “Unemployed”, 31% of companies suffer from imperfect efficiency and turnover as a result of inexpensive pay to their employees. Hence, employees’ wage level is a key factor that is reflected through the output and success.
One the other hand, the work of the chief executive should be also extremely paid. As a general rule, managers possess a larger range of responsibilities and obligations than other hired hands. Moreover, the boss should be not only a qualified specialist in their field BUT ALSO acquires managerial skills. For instance, my colleague's manager has moved to another company because of a low payment that did not correspond to the range of their duties. Thus, chiefs own a higher workload than other employees and this should be well rewarded.
To conclude, labour should possess a high salary as this contributes to their development in the workplace. However, the managers’ efforts also need be rewarded by high pay for their wide diapason of work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly a qualified specialist in their field BUT ALSO acquires managerial skills. For...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99502188749 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6299702951 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163844019917 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555067403776 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404117117379 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1013027213 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304000846553 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.