Some people think killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary and some people think is essential for daily life. Discuss both view and give your own opinions.
Since our ancestors learned how to hunt to survive the fierce natural environment, animals have always been an essential part of human diet but voices heard that animals can never be regarded as food or materials for some products. Personally, I still remain unconvinced of this viewpoint.
Virtually, domesticated animals are essential for our life. To be more specific, poultry are major sources of meat, eggs as well as milk and considered necessary to support healthy living. Such is the case for protein and fat, which, as indispensable nutrients, are found rich and of high quality on animals. On the other hand, the rapid growth of global population leads to the further demand for more food. Considering that there still exist many people suffering from starvation or malnutrition in the less developed countries, it is hardly reasonable to stop killing livestock now.
Nevertheless, the criticism about consuming animal-related products does make sense to some extent. On the basis of a report issued by the Department of Environmental protection in China explaining the carbon footprint, the more animals consumed by people, the more greenhouse gas will be emitted. Besides, despite existing laws that forbid poaching rare animals for human consumption, wild animals are still being hunted and slaughtered inhumanely in many places. Fisherman detach shark-fins from sharks and then abandon them to their fate, leaving them dying hopelessly since they are no longer able to swim or hunt. Such cruel and inhuman behaviour must be forbidden.
In summary, consumption of animals should be encouraged due to the increasing need for more food, while the authorities should enforce some regulations to protect animals’ rights and prevent more animals from extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essential part of human diet but voices heard that animals can never be regarded...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eat, eggs as well as milk and considered necessary to support healthy living. Suc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, well, while, in summary, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45323741007 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90456210658 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679856115108 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5594278329 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.615384615 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212675752518 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723833265841 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631319742675 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13189599453 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268045219874 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.