Some people think the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Lots of people want to be rich and strongly believe that become a richer man can bring them happiness. However, where does this happiness come from? Maybe some people enjoy a life with various material comforts, while others feel satisfied when helping other people. I agree that helping others is a super-happiness thing, and many richer man become philanthropist since it can make them feel happy.
Obviously, lots of people dream of becoming the rich since money can guarantee their material needs and other entertainment if they want. Those who have lived in poverty for a long time always the person who urged to become rich. For them, luxurious material enjoyment is the happiest thing in their life. They can be satisfied with getting what they could not get in the past. However, people always feel greed by material happiness, and in someday, material satisfaction can no longer give people happiness since they get used to such a life.
On the contrary, helping others can make people feel meaningful, especially when you can solve problem by what you have. In this aspect, it maybe can explain why many richer man donate money or establish foundation. Spending a lot of money on big meal maybe can make a person feel happy for a day, while helping a poor person or hopeless guy can get a long-term gratitude or even a sincere friendship. A short-term material enjoyment is clearly not comparable for the pleasure of helping others.
Overall, although for the rich, spending their money on themselves is important, but using it to change others’ life is more meaningful and can bring more happiness at last.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94525547445 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63323633841 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536496350365 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9793313948 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174595745911 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06841450052 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553772905192 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111694819983 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541173494597 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.