Scientists and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate change. Governments cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further damage.
What are your views? Give reasons for your answer.
The environment problem, especially climate change such as global warming, has become more serious which pushes scientists start to urge governments to introduce measures to reduce the air pollution. Some environmentalists advocate individuals to change their lifestyle in order to protect environment. I tend to believe that the governments and individuals should take join responsibility for this problem.
First of all, no one can deny that environment will become better if everyone can try their best to protect nature. People could think more carefully about using electric, water resource and etc. in their home. Such as using less electricity or replacing traditional light bulbs to energy-efficient one. Moreover, people could choose go outside by riding bike instead of driving private car. And this can decrease the greenhouse gas emissions that are seem as its main cause. Although one person’s behavior may have little effect, but the more number of people join in, the less damage will environment have.
Secondly, government still can do lots of thing which may more effective on protecting nature. A truth is, industry accounts for a large proportion of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. However, only government that has enough power to enact a law to restrict air pollution of those companies. Also, governments can discuss for climate change and ensure the solutions which many countries approve for. The government can give useful strategies to mitigate climate change, and without such co-operating, efforts to reduce fuel consumption are unlikely to be such effective.
In conclusion, I believe that only the government and the individual both try their best to protect environment and reduce the gas emissions can protect our earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ly about using electric, water resource and etc. in their home. Such as using less elect...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to go'
Suggestion: to go
...ient one. Moreover, people could choose go outside by riding bike instead of drivi...
^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...e the greenhouse gas emissions that are seem as its main cause. Although one person&...
^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
... Secondly, government still can do lots of thing which may more effective on protecting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50724637681 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97312358861 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615942028986 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2560128193 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185392418227 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611372308209 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531020731306 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121913057513 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080550831497 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.