The line graph below shows the population size, birth and death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph presents the information about two factors that relate to population size in England from the year 1700 to 2000. The line chart shows that the trend of England population have grown continuously within 300 years.
The population size is effected by birth rate and death rate. In the year 1700 to 1750, the birth rate raised from 26 to 40 which means more and more people were born during these year. Then the birth rate level off at 40 for 50 years. The death rate had similar trend as birth rate but the number was lower than it. So the population size at this period raised from 2 to 10 and then dropped down to 4.
From 1800 to 1950, the birth rate decreased from 40 to 22 except a stay at 32 from 1850 to 1900. The graph presents a remarkable decrease for death rate from 1800 and 1850, and the gap between birth rate and death rate reached the biggest from 1850 to 1900, which the population size boomed from 10 millions to 44 millions. Although then in 1900 to 1950, both two rate decreased, the population size continuously incline sharply. From 1950 to 2000, the death rate kept at 20 while birth rate started to raise and reached at 34 in the end of 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...own continuously within 300 years. The population size is effected by birth ra...
^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this year' or 'these years'?
Suggestion: this year; these years
...s more and more people were born during these year. Then the birth rate level off at 40 fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39819004525 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15138267423 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497737556561 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4879034538 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3636363636 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352147696355 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161047533813 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799769563383 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263235572949 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349544887645 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.