Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clear up the pollution they produced. The government should not pay for it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People start to rethink what they have done toward environment and try to protect nature. A number of individuals regard that this is companies and private person’s responsibility and the taxes should be used in other aspect but not in environment. I am totally disagree with this opinion and believe that if the government join in, the problem could be solved faster.
It is true that factories harm environment and cause many irreversible damage. To sustain the speed of economy development, factories and companies always put in full operation which not only produce productions but also create loads of pollutions. Many companies refuse to dispose industrial wastes because of its high cost and wish the government can give them financial support. Sadly to said, when government take more taxes from people, a large percentage of them comes from those companies. So it is necessary for government to spend some money to help those companies.
Human’s activities could also led to serious waster in natural resource. For example, many people always forget to turn off the light when they leave the room and waste lots of electricity. Also, the erosion of carbon dioxide boom with the increasing number of private cars. What human are now working so hard for is a mass-produced, comfortable life which sacrificed the environment as a result. So I agree individual should pay for their wrong behaviors. However, it still has some work for government to do. The commercial advertisements or special classes can guide people to have an environmental-friendly life style and save natural resources. And the government should pay for such cost.
Overall, the government should pay enough money and focus in environmental protection, and the companies and individuals could follow these behaviors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ct but not in environment. I am totally disagree with this opinion and believe that if t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun damage seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much irreversible damage', 'a good deal of irreversible damage'.
Suggestion: much irreversible damage; a good deal of irreversible damage
...at factories harm environment and cause many irreversible damage. To sustain the speed of economy develo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... Human's activities could also led to serious waster in natural resource. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, for example, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31597222222 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08473871562 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1300902048 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0588235294 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331344650076 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100578234923 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935729701837 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187849650181 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716609729581 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.