It is a controversial issue whether it is parents’ obligation to cultivate children to be good members. However, some believe the responsibility lies on the school they attend. Although the arguments of both sides could be persuasive, I intend to argue that both parents and the school cannot be excluded from this issue.
To begin with, family education is the first community children are encountered. How to interact with people properly and express themselves appropriately rely on learning from their parents. Furthermore, children at the age before socialization also tend to imitate how their parents behave. For instance, if they always speak foul languages and throw everything in their surrounding to release their temper, instead of talking to each other rationally, children will no doubt learn their ways about how to deal with their feelings. It definitely has negative influence on children.
On the other hand, after attending schools, the lesson teacher need to instruct will be to cooperate with their classmates in projects. Besides, during their learning procedure, asking questions in arrangements is another goal of extreme importance. Take one of my classmate for example, even if he is 23 years old now, he still lack the knowledge of respecting people. He never waits until others finished their questions which is discussing. As a result, everyone in my class does not enjoy being around with him. The aforementioned example indicates that he was not instructed well in the social parts.
By way of conclusion, in my opinion, both educations, in family unit and in social unit, are of equal importance and should be placed the same value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'lacks'.
Suggestion: lacks
...ven if he is 23 years old now, he still lack the knowledge of respecting people. He ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2723880597 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94096846296 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660447761194 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5658563875 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206235369771 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665767849943 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576814515554 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133094963533 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873019547292 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.