some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Some people believe that parents should play the role in teaching children to become a good member in society. Others agree that the role is of school. Each view has its own reasons and I agree with both the ideas.
On the one hand, parents need to show their children to act as a good citizen. The reason is that parents are always behind their kids, orient them everything they should do. The fact that kids are not mature enough to understand wrong or right things enables their parents taking the training role. Thus, when their kids do something wrong, their mother or father should explain to them so that they know that they are wrong. In contrast, when children do something good, parents should give them some encouragement to develop those good actions. These actions can significantly contribute to the development of a child and help his or her to be a good person.
On the other hand, school should also take the role in training young people to become a good citizen in society. Because, schools, with its primary role, have the tasks to provide their students not only academic knowledge but also social behaviour to become good members in society by using a vast range of subjects taught for youngsters. For example, in primary schools in Vietnam, they not only teach some subjects such as mathematics, reading, but also provide other subjects relating to training moral lessons. The lessons show young people the ways to become a good pupil in schools and an excellent child in families. Being trained with those lessons, children will understand everything they should do and should avoid doing to become a good member in society.
In conclusion, both parents and schools should play their integral roles in guiding and teaching children to become good members in wherever they live.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90553745928 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37177842447 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504885993485 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4211418039 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290935284326 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118094580865 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917681469671 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219705287781 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687110680145 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.