It is a debatable view regarding who should have the responsibility to teach kids about how to become a social responsible person. According to my view, both parents and teachers have the equal charge on this task.
Obviously, parents are worrying about kids behavior since when they born. As examples, eating habits, speak with the truth, how to obey to the adults and the way to be a kind person like wise. Every guardian teach those aspects from their long term experience. Sometimes children do not take advices from them because they spend less time with their parents since parents are busy with their work life and the way of they are teaching is not interesting within children. Owing to the facts that parents are losing the opportunity to spend with kids and share the knowledge and experience which help to be understood the value of a good person.
However, schools can also provide guidance for students about ethics and qualities other than the subject materials. As example, volunteer programs are being organized by schools and teaches encourage students to participate with that programs. This is an opportunity for a students to understand the value of helping to each other. If a student has a chance to joined with school sport activities such as cricket, volleyball and badminton, he would realize how essentially the team work in to his life. In order to those examples. It explains schools are always contributing to the society to make a better students in every aspect.
In conclusion, according to my point of view, schools are doing great service as well as home to create a person who are socially responsible and those parties have liable to build a great man to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...at programs. This is an opportunity for a students to understand the value of helping to e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91034482759 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62022681938 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7683222026 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197560729793 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640962457708 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338414233138 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109953291716 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443664024276 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.